<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging: a health warning!</title>
	<link>http://e4innovation.com/?p=66</link>
	<description>E-learning innovation: research, evaluation, practice and policy</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Gráinne</title>
		<link>http://e4innovation.com/?p=66#comment-78</link>
		<author>Gráinne</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://e4innovation.com/?p=66#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Yes good observation - we have a long way to go to try and properly assess different forms of academic discourse - the blogsphere is just the tip of the ice berg - when you look at all the alternative ways of connecting knowledge, sensemaking, visualising arguments (as Simon Buckingham Shum amongst others talk about),, then we have a big issue and it comes back again to my rather pompously worded question 'What is the nature of academic discourse'????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes good observation - we have a long way to go to try and properly assess different forms of academic discourse - the blogsphere is just the tip of the ice berg - when you look at all the alternative ways of connecting knowledge, sensemaking, visualising arguments (as Simon Buckingham Shum amongst others talk about),, then we have a big issue and it comes back again to my rather pompously worded question &#8216;What is the nature of academic discourse&#8217;????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ Cann</title>
		<link>http://e4innovation.com/?p=66#comment-75</link>
		<author>AJ Cann</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://e4innovation.com/?p=66#comment-75</guid>
		<description>@Sarah: At one level or another, I think all academics are going through the blogging debate at the moment. Here's my version, Why Blog:
http://www.microbiologybytes.com/AJC/whyblog.html

The truth is, until blogging, in some form, is accepted as "output" by universities, then RAE will rule the roost and academic bloggers are on thin ice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sarah: At one level or another, I think all academics are going through the blogging debate at the moment. Here&#8217;s my version, Why Blog:<br />
<a href="http://www.microbiologybytes.com/AJC/whyblog.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.microbiologybytes.com/AJC/whyblog.html</a></p>
<p>The truth is, until blogging, in some form, is accepted as &#8220;output&#8221; by universities, then RAE will rule the roost and academic bloggers are on thin ice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gráinne</title>
		<link>http://e4innovation.com/?p=66#comment-73</link>
		<author>Gráinne</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 22:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://e4innovation.com/?p=66#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Interestingly that you were put off blogging by your supervisor Sarah. I disagree - I think nowadays blogs are a valuable and important academic output, plus look at the increasing momentum around 'openness' - the Open Educational Resources movement, Open Source, creative commons and increasing number of academics behind movements such as ePrints (led originally I think by Southampton Uni) to make as much academic output digitally available as possible. Furthermore I think the same rules of citation, fair play and 'academic rules' apply to blogs as they do to papers. Also I may well aggregate bits from across my blog into a paper at a later date but the paper will still be unique and have its own narrative and central focus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly that you were put off blogging by your supervisor Sarah. I disagree - I think nowadays blogs are a valuable and important academic output, plus look at the increasing momentum around &#8216;openness&#8217; - the Open Educational Resources movement, Open Source, creative commons and increasing number of academics behind movements such as ePrints (led originally I think by Southampton Uni) to make as much academic output digitally available as possible. Furthermore I think the same rules of citation, fair play and &#8216;academic rules&#8217; apply to blogs as they do to papers. Also I may well aggregate bits from across my blog into a paper at a later date but the paper will still be unique and have its own narrative and central focus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gráinne</title>
		<link>http://e4innovation.com/?p=66#comment-72</link>
		<author>Gráinne</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 22:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://e4innovation.com/?p=66#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Yep agree a title is worth alot - it's the make or break between someone skipping to another page or staying and reading the article!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep agree a title is worth alot - it&#8217;s the make or break between someone skipping to another page or staying and reading the article!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah stewart</title>
		<link>http://e4innovation.com/?p=66#comment-71</link>
		<author>sarah stewart</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 20:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://e4innovation.com/?p=66#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this post-I am very interested in this discussion about the 'value' of academic blogging. I am still trying to get my head around why I blog and what I am trying to achieve by it. I started a PhD blog but was put off it by my supervisor. The rationale was that anything I 'published' on the net could not then be re-published in a journal. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this post-I am very interested in this discussion about the &#8216;value&#8217; of academic blogging. I am still trying to get my head around why I blog and what I am trying to achieve by it. I started a PhD blog but was put off it by my supervisor. The rationale was that anything I &#8216;published&#8217; on the net could not then be re-published in a journal. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ Cann</title>
		<link>http://e4innovation.com/?p=66#comment-69</link>
		<author>AJ Cann</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://e4innovation.com/?p=66#comment-69</guid>
		<description>In the ADD world of the blogosphere, nailing the title is half the battle!  ;-)
I share your analysis of a blog as a mixture of repository plus reflection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the ADD world of the blogosphere, nailing the title is half the battle!  <img src='http://e4innovation.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I share your analysis of a blog as a mixture of repository plus reflection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
